Abstract:
The objective of this study was to come out with the benefits of eucalyptus plantations to household food
security through a comparative analysis of eucalyptus growers and non-growers in Gafarsa Gujje Woreda,
highland of Ethiopia. Data for the study was obtained both from primary and secondary sources through
document reviews, household surveys, focus group discussions, key informant interviews, and field
observations. The study utilized HFIAS, MAHFP, and CSI as the main food security assessment tools in
addition to exploring the economic contribution of eucalyptus plantations to household livelihood and food
security through household surveys. Data was analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively after administering
the survey on 165 sampled households. According to this study, 100%, 91%, and 69% of the eucalyptus
grower households reported they plant eucalyptus trees mainly to generate additional income, meet own
in-kind needs (construction, fencing, and firewood requirements), and to replace their declining crop yield,
respectively. The study revealed that eucalyptus takes only 14% of the total land holding per HH even if it
is the second most source of income for the households. Respondent households indicated that income from
eucalyptus products contributes to household food security by covering food needs during months of food
gap, immediate cash during shocks, purchase of agricultural inputs, and in-house food and non-food items
for the households. The study using the HFIAS scale indicated that only about 45% and 34% of the
respondents fall under food secure households both for eucalyptus growers and non-growers, respectively.
Observed through a regression analysis that food insecurity increases with increasing age and family size
of the households, whereas household land holding size for non-eucalyptus growers has significantly shown
an inverse relationship with increasing household food insecurity. Income from eucalyptus didn’t show any
significant relationship with increasing or decreasing food insecurity. The study on consumption coping
strategies showed that about 20% and 14% of households practice high coping strategies both for
eucalyptus growers and non-growers, respectively. The assessment using the MAHFP indicated that
compared to non-eucalyptus growers, eucalyptus growers have more sustaining household livelihood and
better food security status due to the significant contribution of eucalyptus plantations. Eucalyptus
plantations in the highlands of Ethiopia need high government attention due to their dominant plantation
and the high dependence of households for their livelihoods and food security.
